intolerance Archives | Our Daily Bread Ministries Canada https://ourdailybreadministries.ca/questions_tag/intolerance/ Devotions to Help You Connect with God Every Day Wed, 02 Oct 2024 20:21:32 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 https://ourdailybreadministries.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/ODBMC-logo-retina-66x66.png intolerance Archives | Our Daily Bread Ministries Canada https://ourdailybreadministries.ca/questions_tag/intolerance/ 32 32 Should Christians be tolerant? https://ourdailybreadministries.ca/questions/should-christians-be-tolerant/ Fri, 13 Sep 2024 19:13:22 +0000 https://ourdailybreadministries.ca/questions/should-christians-be-tolerant/ Let’s be honest about the emotional reaction some of us have towards the concept of tolerance as a principle. If there were ever a buzzword for our culture, tolerance is it, and many of those who uphold this principle are often doing so in ways that are synonymous with an anything-goes belief system. And if compromise […]

The post Should Christians be tolerant? appeared first on Our Daily Bread Ministries Canada.

]]>
Let’s be honest about the emotional reaction some of us have towards the concept of tolerance as a principle. If there were ever a buzzword for our culture, tolerance is it, and many of those who uphold this principle are often doing so in ways that are synonymous with an anything-goes belief system. And if compromise and a wishy-washy belief system is what we mean by tolerance, then we can certainly understand why a Christian would not want to be labeled as tolerant. But in a strict sense, tolerance has nothing to do with compromise. It is simply the ability to allow for views different than our own.

So, should Christians be tolerant? Well, that depends. If tolerance means compromising our belief in the message of Jesus Christ, the story of the Bible, or historic Christianity to avoid conflict with others, then no. But if tolerance means that we strive to live unwavering in our convictions and at the same time love others unconditionally, then yes. In this sense tolerance would look a lot like embracing prostitutes, tax collectors, drunks, and other sinners like ourselves. It would look a lot like emptying ourselves of our spiritual pride, looking beyond people’s actions, and seeing them as people who matter to God. It would look a lot like submitting ourselves to the will of God and laying down our lives for those who desperately need His mercy and forgiveness.

In other words, it would look a lot like Jesus.

The post Should Christians be tolerant? appeared first on Our Daily Bread Ministries Canada.

]]>
How Can the Christian Tradition Be Defended? https://ourdailybreadministries.ca/questions/how-can-the-christian-tradition-be-defended/ Fri, 13 Sep 2024 19:09:56 +0000 https://ourdailybreadministries.ca/questions/how-can-the-christian-tradition-be-defended/ It’s easy to see why people think the Christian tradition breeds intolerance. When the Israelites invaded Canaan, they were under orders to kill its inhabitants mercilessly. Later, but without the same divine sanction, “Christian” conquerors ruthlessly fashioned Christian religion into a cultural weapon that they combined with military force. Much of the “Christianization” of the […]

The post How Can the Christian Tradition Be Defended? appeared first on Our Daily Bread Ministries Canada.

]]>
It’s easy to see why people think the Christian tradition breeds intolerance. When the Israelites invaded Canaan, they were under orders to kill its inhabitants mercilessly. Later, but without the same divine sanction, “Christian” conquerors ruthlessly fashioned Christian religion into a cultural weapon that they combined with military force. Much of the “Christianization” of the West was accomplished at the edge of the sword, and the motives of “Christian” warlords were mixed at best.

Compared superficially with biblical faith, paganism seems tolerant. Under paganism everyone has his own gods (and values), and, in theory, everyone is willing to let other people believe, worship, and act as they wish. Everyone tolerates everybody else’s gods, and everybody gets along.

In actuality, things don’t work out so amicably. Different gods represent different moral and cultural values. Inevitably the gods (and values) of pagan groups clash. In paganism, the stronger groups eventually overwhelm the weaker ones and impose their gods on them with no pretense of concern for justice. If we observe parts of the world still controlled by pagan religious and cultural values we will gain a more realistic view of pagan “tolerance.” Pagan cultures are characterized by tribalism, witchcraft, superstition, and fear. In fact, such was the state of pagan Europe before the introduction of the gospel.

It’s true that Christian faith was exploited by kings, crusaders, and inquisitors. In depressing regularity, cunning, worldly kings cynically led their “Christian” armies against other “Christian” (as well as pagan and Muslim) foes. In spite of this, the Christian gospel and the influence of the Holy Spirit was at work within the imperfect vessel of Western culture, asserting the infinite worth of each individual to a loving God. As a result, even though the Christian religious tradition continues to be labeled as intolerant by its enemies, the influence of biblical religion has made the Western world by far the most humane, enlightened, tolerant, and diverse society that has ever existed.

Much of the intolerance within Western, Christian tradition has been indefensible. But in spite of serious flaws, some of the intolerance of this tradition was aimed against real falsehood, injustice, superstition, and evil. Why? Because biblical religion alone is based on a view of God that gives both tolerance and intolerance a reasonable basis.

The Canaanites were probably surprised that the Israelites looked with horror on the human sacrifices and other kinds of inhuman depravity that they carried out in the names of their gods. They were convinced that if they didn’t perform their horrible rituals, their gods would be angered and they would be punished.1

Similarly, the Aztecs (who sacrificed thousands of victims each year to their sun god and cannibalized their bodies) were shocked and amazed that the Spaniards looked upon their sacred religious duties with revulsion.

The church today is clearly not in the position of Israel. In fact, whenever the church has sought to directly assume the reins of governmental authority, she has lost her love for her Lord and has become cruel and corrupt. But God has placed the church where she can do His work. She can (and should) influence culture and government by setting an example of purity and love. She is also in a position to make an appeal to culture and government upon the basis of reason and natural law.

In spite of glaring failures, it was the presence of the church and its witness that nurtured the ethical and humanitarian vision of the West. Only when people believe in the biblical God, a holy Creator who has established real moral law and who demands allegiance to truth and justice, are they willing to trust the process of law and justice. There can be no civility without confidence in law and justice.

But just as important as the influence of the church in establishing the worth of the individual and in promoting faith and justice was the biblical call for the transformation of the individual heart.

At the heart of both the Old and New Testaments is a declaration that the most essential thing for the human soul is individual conversion,2 being “born again” in response to the call of the Holy Spirit. This individual response is all-important, the one thing that determines each person’s eternal destiny. This biblical emphasis on personal conversion confirms the worth and dignity of the individual. Each person is responsible for his own spiritual destiny. The biblical call for personal conversion underlies the emphasis on individual freedom and dignity that are coming to fruition in the West (and in other societies that are adopting Western values). It was biblical respect for the individual conscience that led to the development of the Western political concept of “freedom of religion.” Even today in modern Islamic countries, converts to Christianity and critics of Islam are being put to death.

The Bible’s intolerance for falsehood and evil is the basis for any genuine tolerance. Although much evil has been done in the name of biblical religion, only the unwise would deny the importance of the biblical principles that nurture and uphold our most essential cultural values ( Psalm 14:1; Proverbs 10:8; 18:2).

  1. The Canaanite culture placed a low value on human life. Canaanites practiced human sacrifice, bestiality, and ritual prostitution as part of their religious ritual.

    This was one of the reasons that the Old Testament was so uncompromising in its call for the obliteration of Canaanite culture. It was so depraved that if it had survived, it would have contaminated everyone living in contact with it.

    Where Christian influence spread, beginning in Europe and eventually in such diverse places as the Americas, Africa, India, and the Pacific Islands, human sacrifice, social castes, slavery (See the ATQ article, Why Does the Bible Tolerate Slavery?), polygamy, cannibalism, and other degrading, dehumanizing customs have been suppressed.

    A.(Leviticus 18:21-26; 20:2-5; Deuteronomy 12:31; 18:10; 2 Kings 17:31; 2 Chronicles 28:3; Psalm 106:34-41; Isaiah 57:5; Jeremiah 7:31; 19:5; 32:35).

    B. The ancient Middle East made a place for homosexuality and bestiality in its myths and rites. In the Asherah cult, the qedeshim priests had a reputation for homosexual practices, even as the qedeshot priestesses for prostitution. Israel eventually banned both the qedeshim and qedeshot, while in Ugarit the qedeshim and kohanim were priestly guilds in equally good standing. Baal is portrayed in Ugaritic mythology as impregnating a heifer to sire the young bull god. The biblical book of Leviticus (18:22-27) bans homosexuality and bestiality expressly because the Canaanite population had been practicing those rites, which the Hebrews rejected as abominations (Encyclopedia Britannica, Middle Eastern Religions, p.64).

    C. The Baalim and the Baalot, gods and goddesses of the Earth, were believed to be the revitalizers of the forces of nature upon which agriculture depended. The revitalization process involved a sacred marriage (hieros gamos) replete with sexual symbolic and actual activities between men, representing the Baalim, and the sacred temple prostitutes (qedeshot), representing the Baalot. Cultic ceremonies involving sexual acts between male members of the agricultural communities and sacred prostitutes dedicated to the Baalim were focused on the Canaanite concept of sympathetic magic. As the Baalim (through the actions of selected men) both symbolically and actually impregnated the sacred prostitutes in order to reproduce in kind, so also, it was believed, the Baalim (as gods of the weather and the Earth) would send the rains (often identified with semen) to the Earth so that it might yield abundant harvests of grains and fruits. Canaanite myths incorporating such fertility myths are represented in the mythological texts of the ancient city of Ugarit (modern Ras Shamra) in northern Syria; though the high god El and his consort are important as the first pair of the pantheon. Baal and his sexually passionate sister-consort are significant in the creation of the world and the renewal of nature (Encyclopedia Britannica, Biblical Literature, p.783,a).

    The most shocking and significant cultic newcomer to Rome was the Great Mother in her castrating forms—Cybele, Atargatis, Astarte. These were versions of the same goddess the Hebrews deplored and whose eunuch or homosexual priests served in temples over much of the Near East. She arrived in Rome in 204 BC, and at first her adherents were few. The Galli, her priests, were all immigrants from Asia Minor, for Roman men were not allowed to emasculate themselves in emulation of Attis to serve her. In the middle of the first century AD, the emperor Claudius incorporated the worship of Cybele into the state religion. (When the basilica of St. Peter’s on Vatican Hill was enlarged around 1607, inscriptions were found showing that a sanctuary of Cybele had once stood there.) Before long the goddess had a huge following in Rome, and her shrines stood not only in Italy but in Africa, Spain, Portugal, France, Germany, and Bulgaria. In the third century baptism in the blood of a bull or ram was added to her ritual of initiation, and Roman citizens were permitted to become neophytes. In the fourth century St. Augustine said that the idol of the goddess was bathed in the Tiber and carried along in a boat that aristocratic matrons pulled by ropes from the shore, while Galli danced alongside in a frenzy, shaking their tambourines (Sexuality And Homosexuality, A New View, Arno Karlen, W. W. Norton and Company, Inc., New York, 1971). Back To Article

  2. (Deuteronomy 6:5; 30:6; 1 Samuel 7:3; 2 Kings 22:19; 1 Chronicles 29:17; Psalm 34:18; 51:2,10-13,17; 147:3; Isaiah 57:15; 61:1; Ezekiel 11:19-20; 36:26,31;Jeremiah 4:4; 31:33; Zechariah 12:10; Luke 4:18; John 3:3-10; Romans 2:28-29; 2 Corinthians 3:18; 5:17 ). Back To Article

The post How Can the Christian Tradition Be Defended? appeared first on Our Daily Bread Ministries Canada.

]]>
Isn’t It Always Wrong To Be Intolerant? https://ourdailybreadministries.ca/questions/isnt-it-always-wrong-to-be-intolerant/ Fri, 13 Sep 2024 19:07:43 +0000 https://ourdailybreadministries.ca/questions/isnt-it-always-wrong-to-be-intolerant/ Tolerance is an important virtue. Given the wide range of human perspectives and imperfections, patient tolerance—humble endurance of other people’s shortcomings—is basic to the foundation of civil society. Scripture emphasizes the importance of tolerance (Proverbs 12:20; Proverbs 15:1; Matthew 5:9; Romans 12:18). Tolerance is important. But if practiced to excess, it becomes an idol. It is difficult to […]

The post Isn’t It Always Wrong To Be Intolerant? appeared first on Our Daily Bread Ministries Canada.

]]>
Tolerance is an important virtue. Given the wide range of human perspectives and imperfections, patient tolerance—humble endurance of other people’s shortcomings—is basic to the foundation of civil society. Scripture emphasizes the importance of tolerance (Proverbs 12:20; Proverbs 15:1; Matthew 5:9; Romans 12:18).

Tolerance is important. But if practiced to excess, it becomes an idol.

It is difficult to think of virtues as idols, but if any particular virtue isn’t considered in the context of God’s overall authority and the interdependence of all virtues on each other, it can easily become one. As an example, consider the virtue of courage. Most great discoveries and accomplishments require courage. Yet many people have suffered and died when foolhardiness or aggression has been mistaken for courage.

Genuine courage is in harmony with the other virtues. The other virtues provide a context that defines genuine courage. Caution, for example, seeks the least dangerous alternative. If an action has no regard for caution, it can’t be considered genuinely courageous. Justice is concerned with whether a potential action is ethical. If a potential action has no regard for justice, it can’t be considered courageous. In fact, it would be an act of aggression, not courage.

If caution were the only virtue, innovation and freedom would disappear. If justice were the only virtue, society would be paralyzed by a legalistic quest for a degree of moral perfection impossible in a fallen world.

In some historical contexts, tolerance has been the most important virtue, defending freedom of expression, action, and thought. But just as foolhardiness and aggression can be mistaken for courage, laziness and fatalism can be mistaken for tolerance.

The apostle Paul gave us a short list of what he considered the greatest virtues in 1 Corinthians 13:13: faith, hope, and love. But even of these three, he declared the greatest to be love (1 Corinthians 1,13).

Lesser virtues like tolerance must be measured by the standards of love. Love is what makes the lesser virtues virtuous. It is their source and their goal. If caution were the most important virtue, there would never be cause for risk. If courage were the most important value, there would never be a reason for surrender. If justice were the most important value, there would never be grounds for mercy; and if tolerance were the only virtue, there would never be any room for truth.

Love sets the criteria for real tolerance. Real tolerance can’t exist apart from judgment and discernment in response to individual and social evil. “Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil. Cling to what is good” (Romans 12:9 NKJV).

Under the rule of love, some evils must be confronted.

The post Isn’t It Always Wrong To Be Intolerant? appeared first on Our Daily Bread Ministries Canada.

]]>